Jeff Law writes:
> On 05/27/14 02:04, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>
>> It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
>> approval for the testsuite parts only.
>>
>> While I don't need approval for the Solaris-only parts, it would be good
>> if the doc and build changes could be
On 05/27/14 02:04, Rainer Orth wrote:
It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
approval for the testsuite parts only.
While I don't need approval for the Solaris-only parts, it would be good
if the doc and build changes could be checked by the respective
maintaine
Hi Gerald,
> On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
>> So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer,
>> but, the changes are usual and customary for a port, and trivial.
>
> Yes, and I'd like to emphasize this point: Just because a file
> matches *.texi doesn't mean that
On Tue, 27 May 2014, Mike Stump wrote:
> So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer,
> but, the changes are usual and customary for a port, and trivial.
Yes, and I'd like to emphasize this point: Just because a file
matches *.texi doesn't mean that ports, middle, front,
Mike Stump writes:
> On May 27, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>> It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
>> approval for the testsuite parts only.
>
> So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer, but,
> the changes are usual and
On May 27, 2014, at 1:04 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> It's been a week since I've submitted the patch, so far having received
> approval for the testsuite parts only.
So, I read the doc bits, and they look fine. I’m not a doc reviewer, but, the
changes are usual and customary for a port, and trivia
Rainer Orth writes:
> Rainer Orth writes:
>
>> Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
>> Solaris/x86 with Sun as
>>
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
>>
>> I've reworked the clearing of hardware capabilities via linker maps for
>> Sun ld
On May 20, 2014, at 6:03 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> The following patch implements what I've outlined there
> Ok for mainline and 4.9 branch if those pass?
For the test suite bits, Ok.
Rainer Orth writes:
> Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
> Solaris/x86 with Sun as
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
>
> I've reworked the clearing of hardware capabilities via linker maps for
> Sun ld, which is currently replicated
Prompted by the recent failures of c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-2.c on
Solaris/x86 with Sun as
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00943.html
I've reworked the clearing of hardware capabilities via linker maps for
Sun ld, which is currently replicated in several places all over the
10 matches
Mail list logo
