Re: [testsuite] Adding target nonpic to certain tests part. 2

2013-07-25 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
*Ping* Richard, you approved adding "target nonpic" last time, could you please take quick a look? I regularly encounter failing due to "AVAIL_OVERWRITABLE" tests on Android.. When people write tests they don't consider pic targets. thanks, Alexander 2013/7/8 Alexander Ivchenko : > *Ping* > >>>

Re: [testsuite] Adding target nonpic to certain tests part. 2

2013-07-08 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
*Ping* >>> Another bunch of tests that fails with -fpic. >>> >>> from here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00539.html >>> "Since -fpic option is turned on by default in Android we have certain test >>> fails. The reason for that is that those tests rely on the >>> availability of fun

Re: [testsuite] Adding target nonpic to certain tests part. 2

2013-06-10 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Yep, that also works for us. I updated the patch. Is it ok for trunk? --Alexander 2013/6/5 Patrick Marlier : > Hi Alexander, > > At least for TM testcase, I would prefer to add 'transaction_safe' > attribute on foobar as in the attached patch. > Aldy and Richard H: What do you think? > > Thanks,

Re: [testsuite] Adding target nonpic to certain tests part. 2

2013-06-05 Thread Patrick Marlier
Hi Alexander, At least for TM testcase, I would prefer to add 'transaction_safe' attribute on foobar as in the attached patch. Aldy and Richard H: What do you think? Thanks, -- Patrick On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Alexander Ivchenko wrote: > Hi, > > Another bunch of tests that fails with -fp

[testsuite] Adding target nonpic to certain tests part. 2

2013-06-05 Thread Alexander Ivchenko
Hi, Another bunch of tests that fails with -fpic. from here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-01/msg00539.html "Since -fpic option is turned on by default in Android we have certain test fails. The reason for that is that those tests rely on the availability of functions, defined in them an