On 06/07/11 18:33, Janis Johnson wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 06:25 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>> On 23/06/11 22:38, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>> Tests wmul-[1234].c and mla-2.c in gcc.target/arm require support that
>>> the arm backend identifies as TARGET_DSP_MULTIPLY. The tests all
>>> specify a -march
On 06/29/2011 06:25 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 23/06/11 22:38, Janis Johnson wrote:
>> Tests wmul-[1234].c and mla-2.c in gcc.target/arm require support that
>> the arm backend identifies as TARGET_DSP_MULTIPLY. The tests all
>> specify a -march option with that support, but it is overridden
On 23/06/11 22:38, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Tests wmul-[1234].c and mla-2.c in gcc.target/arm require support that
> the arm backend identifies as TARGET_DSP_MULTIPLY. The tests all
> specify a -march option with that support, but it is overridden by
> multilib flags.
>
> This patch adds a new effe
Tests wmul-[1234].c and mla-2.c in gcc.target/arm require support that
the arm backend identifies as TARGET_DSP_MULTIPLY. The tests all
specify a -march option with that support, but it is overridden by
multilib flags.
This patch adds a new effective target, arm_dsp_multiply, and requires
it for
