On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Kirill Yukhin writes:
>
> > On 13 Apr 21:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> Kirill Yukhin writes:
> >>
> >> > Hello Rainer,
> >> > On 08 Apr 15:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> >> Ok for mainline?
> >> >
> >> > Patch is ok, thanks!
> >>
> >> Thanks. How about th
Kirill Yukhin writes:
> On 13 Apr 21:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Kirill Yukhin writes:
>>
>> > Hello Rainer,
>> > On 08 Apr 15:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> >> Ok for mainline?
>> >
>> > Patch is ok, thanks!
>>
>> Thanks. How about the gcc-5 branch? It would be good to avoid those
>> failures ther
On 13 Apr 21:16, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Kirill Yukhin writes:
>
> > Hello Rainer,
> > On 08 Apr 15:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >> Ok for mainline?
> >
> > Patch is ok, thanks!
>
> Thanks. How about the gcc-5 branch? It would be good to avoid those
> failures there, too.
Definetely! OK for gcc-5. (s
Kirill Yukhin writes:
> Hello Rainer,
> On 08 Apr 15:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Ok for mainline?
>
> Patch is ok, thanks!
Thanks. How about the gcc-5 branch? It would be good to avoid those
failures there, too.
Rainer
--
---
Hello Rainer,
On 08 Apr 15:27, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Ok for mainline?
Patch is ok, thanks!
--
K
Some AVX512DQ tests are failing on Solaris/x86 with gas:
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vfpclasspd-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512dq-vfpclassps-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vfpclasspd-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512