On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> + reload_completed = 1;
>> + epilogue_completed = 1;
>>
>> Do we really need these? Perhaps a comment should be added here, it is
>> not obvious at the first sight...
>
> We didn't need these. ia64 did because there we run a split p
On 07/10/2011 02:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> + reload_completed = 1;
> + epilogue_completed = 1;
>
> Do we really need these? Perhaps a comment should be added here, it is
> not obvious at the first sight...
We didn't need these. ia64 did because there we run a split pass
to properly generate
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still better, is to always emit rtl, and support that in
> the
On 07/10/2011 02:33 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>> !deep branch prediction paths.
>>
>> Ideally, we'd do this g
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/09/2011 06:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>>> !
On 07/09/2011 06:42 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
>> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
>> !deep branch prediction paths.
>>
>> Ideally, we'd do this generi
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
> This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
> !deep branch prediction paths.
>
> Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
> but still
I developed this patch while working on the dwarf2 pass series.
This was before I bypassed the entire problem by removing the
!deep branch prediction paths.
Ideally, we'd do this generically from gimple. Less ideally,
but still better, is to always emit rtl, and support that in
the middle end wit
