On Wed, 14 Jul 2021, Jason Merrill wrote:
> As I was discussing with richi, I don't think it makes sense to protect
> calls to pure/const functions from DCE just because they aren't explicitly
> declared noexcept. PR100382 indicates that there are different
> considerations for Go, which has non-
As I was discussing with richi, I don't think it makes sense to protect
calls to pure/const functions from DCE just because they aren't explicitly
declared noexcept. PR100382 indicates that there are different
considerations for Go, which has non-call exceptions. But still turn the
flag off for t
