Re: [pushed][PATCH] identify lfs prefixed case PR95347

2020-06-15 Thread Segher Boessenkool
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 09:25:40AM -0500, Aaron Sawdey wrote: > Now that this has been in trunk for a bit with no issues, ok to back port to > 10? Yes please. Thanks! Segher > > The same problem also arises for plfs where prefixed_load_p() > > doesn't recognize it so we get just lfs in the a

Re: [pushed][PATCH] identify lfs prefixed case PR95347

2020-06-15 Thread Aaron Sawdey via Gcc-patches
Now that this has been in trunk for a bit with no issues, ok to back port to 10? Aaron Sawdey, Ph.D. saw...@linux.ibm.com IBM Linux on POWER Toolchain > On Jun 3, 2020, at 4:10 PM, Aaron Sawdey wrote: > > This passed regstrap and was approved offline by Segher, posting > the final form (minu

[pushed][PATCH] identify lfs prefixed case PR95347

2020-06-03 Thread Aaron Sawdey via Gcc-patches
This passed regstrap and was approved offline by Segher, posting the final form (minus my debug code, oops). The same problem also arises for plfs where prefixed_load_p() doesn't recognize it so we get just lfs in the asm output with an @pcrel address. PR target/95347 * config/rs6