On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:13 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> This fixes the issue I mentioned in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00325.html. When enum
> values are bigger than 255, lto_output_int_in_range was not
> splitting up the values properly.
>
> Additionally, when LTO_tags has more than
This fixes the issue I mentioned in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-05/msg00325.html. When enum
values are bigger than 255, lto_output_int_in_range was not
splitting up the values properly.
Additionally, when LTO_tags has more than 255 values (like it
does on the PPH) branch, output_record_start()