On 13 October 2016 at 22:54, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/13/2016 07:18 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> On 13 October 2016 at 16:56, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2016 07:43 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg010
On 10/13/2016 07:18 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 13 October 2016 at 16:56, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 10/06/2016 07:43 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01038.html
If I understand correctly this is a latent issue where nonexistant
On 13 October 2016 at 16:56, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 10/06/2016 07:43 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>>
>> Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01038.html
>
>
> If I understand correctly this is a latent issue where nonexistant libfunc
> names are stored (but not currentl
On 10/06/2016 07:43 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01038.html
If I understand correctly this is a latent issue where nonexistant
libfunc names are stored (but not currently used). If that's correct,
then OK.
Bernd
Pinging patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-09/msg01038.html
Thanks,
Prathamesh