> On ia64 I get this regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31)
>
> Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test
> should be adjusted.
This actually revealed a problem: the same regression should have appeared on
PowerPC64/Linux (ELFv1 ABI) b
> On ia64 I get this regression:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/Wtrampolines.c (test for warnings, line 31)
I managed to miss it in the test results...
> Since ia64 never uses trampolines this is probably ok and the test
> should be adjusted.
Yes, will do, thanks for the heads up.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Okt 16 2016, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
>> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the
>> documentation.
>>
>> As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4
> this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
> It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the
> documentation.
>
> As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada
> front-en
Hi,
this is the updated version of the patch initially posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg02016.html
It takes into account Jeff's remarks, both on the code and the documentation.
As discussed, I'm going to split it into 4 parts: common infrastructure, Ada
front-end bits,
