Re: [patch part, libgcc] Add AVX-specific matmul

2016-12-05 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
On 2016.11.30 at 08:17 +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hello world, > > the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00246.html > (the one going to gcc-patches was rejected due to size of > regernerated files) contains one libgcc change, which exposes > the __cpu_model interface fox i386 t

Re: [patch part, libgcc] Add AVX-specific matmul

2016-11-29 Thread Uros Bizjak
> the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00246.html > (the one going to gcc-patches was rejected due to size of > regernerated files) contains one libgcc change, which exposes > the __cpu_model interface fox i386 to libgfortran. > > The Fortran bits are OKd, but I need an approval f

[patch part, libgcc] Add AVX-specific matmul

2016-11-29 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, the patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00246.html (the one going to gcc-patches was rejected due to size of regernerated files) contains one libgcc change, which exposes the __cpu_model interface fox i386 to libgfortran. The Fortran bits are OKd, but I need an approv