On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Adjusted my original testcase so that eax isn't redeclared and
> shadows. Additional moved
> initialization of eax_live up.
> ChangeLog
>
> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>
> PR target/60193
> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
>
On 02/14/2014 07:19 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>
> PR target/60193
> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
> rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %rax.
> Additional fix wrong offset for restoring both-registers.
>
> ChangeLog testsuite
>
2014-02-14 16:20 GMT+01:00 Richard Henderson :
> On 02/14/2014 06:41 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> + else
>> +{
>> + t = plus_constant (Pmode, eax, UNITS_PER_WORD);
>> + emit_move_insn (eax, t);
>> + t = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, eax);
>> +}
>
Hi,
Adjusted my original testcase so that eax isn't redeclared and
shadows. Additional moved
initialization of eax_live up.
ChangeLog
2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
PR target/60193
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %rax.
A
On 02/14/2014 06:41 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> + else
> +{
> + t = plus_constant (Pmode, eax, UNITS_PER_WORD);
> + emit_move_insn (eax, t);
> + t = gen_rtx_PLUS (Pmode, stack_pointer_rtx, eax);
> +}
Uros is right that you don't need the move here: 8(rsp,
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2014-02-14 15:40 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> 2014-02-14 13:55 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
Hello!
> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>
> PR target/60193
> * config/i386/i38
2014-02-14 15:40 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2014-02-14 13:55 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> Hello!
>>>
2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
PR target/60193
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
rax register as disp
So, here is the asked more complex variant regarding
displacement-value-range of amd64-instruction and taking care that we
use constant-offsets instead of register-based displacement addressing
if possible.
ChangeLog
2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
PR target/60193
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expa
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2014-02-14 13:55 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> Hello!
>>
>>> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>>>
>>> PR target/60193
>>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
>>> rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %eax.
>>>
>>> Regressi
2014-02-14 13:55 GMT+01:00 Uros Bizjak :
> Hello!
>
>> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>>
>> PR target/60193
>> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
>> rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %eax.
>>
>> Regression-tested for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and
>> x86_64-w64-ming
Hello!
> 2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
>
> PR target/60193
> * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
> rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %eax.
>
> Regression-tested for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and
> x86_64-w64-mingw32, and i686-w64-mingw32. Ok for apply?
No, you s
Hi,
ChangeLog
2014-02-14 Kai Tietz
PR target/60193
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Use
rax register as displacement for restoring %r10, %eax.
Regression-tested for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, and
x86_64-w64-mingw32, and i686-w64-mingw32. Ok for apply?
Regards,
Kai
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
