On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:17 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> this patch fixes the issue reported in PR/48984. Issue is that
>> fortran has multiple BOOLEAN_TYPE'ed types with different modes. So
>> the check for BOOLEAN_TYPE in gimplificati
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> this patch fixes the issue reported in PR/48984. Issue is that
> fortran has multiple BOOLEAN_TYPE'ed types with different modes. So
> the check for BOOLEAN_TYPE in gimplification is wrong and instead we
> need to check for identify
2011/5/13 Richard Guenther :
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> 2011-05-13 Kai Tietz
>>>
>>> * gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Check for boolean_type_node instead
>>> for BOOLEAN_TYPE for TRUTH-NOT/AND/OR/XOR.
>>> (gimple_boolify): Check for cast for b
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> 2011-05-13 Kai Tietz
>>
>> * gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Check for boolean_type_node instead
>> for BOOLEAN_TYPE for TRUTH-NOT/AND/OR/XOR.
>> (gimple_boolify): Check for cast for boolean_type_node instead for
>>
> 2011-05-13 Kai Tietz
>
> * gimplify.c (gimplify_expr): Check for boolean_type_node instead
> for BOOLEAN_TYPE for TRUTH-NOT/AND/OR/XOR.
> (gimple_boolify): Check for cast for boolean_type_node instead for
> BOOLEAN_TYPE.
Missing PR middle-end/48984 at the top.
-
Hello,
this patch fixes the issue reported in PR/48984. Issue is that
fortran has multiple BOOLEAN_TYPE'ed types with different modes. So
the check for BOOLEAN_TYPE in gimplification is wrong and instead we
need to check for identify to boolean_type_node.
ChangeLog
2011-05-13 Kai Tietz
