On 12/12/2014 03:58 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2014-12-12 21:15 GMT+01:00 Jason Merrill :
I think it would be better to call maybe_instantiate_noexcept so that we can
have a definite answer.
Jason
Hmm, for case that decl != NULL_TREE, this is ok. But what if decl is
NULL_TREE?
We shouldn't have
2014-12-12 21:15 GMT+01:00 Jason Merrill :
> I think it would be better to call maybe_instantiate_noexcept so that we can
> have a definite answer.
>
> Jason
Hmm, for case that decl != NULL_TREE, this is ok. But what if decl is
NULL_TREE?
Kai
I think it would be better to call maybe_instantiate_noexcept so that we
can have a definite answer.
Jason
Hi,
On 12/12/2014 08:45 PM, Kai Tietz wrote:
#include
#include
I would recommend reducing the testcase further, is very large.
Thanks,
Paolo.
Hi,
following patch fixes reported issue.
Tested for x86_64-w64-mingw32. Ok for apply?
Regards,
Kai
ChangeLog
2014-12-12 Kai Tietz
PR c++/61228
* call.c (set_flags_from_callee): Assume no throw
by deferred noexcept.
2014-12-12 Kai Tietz
PR c++/61228
* g++.dg/cpp0x/