> This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
> for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
> 56997. A secondary goal of this patch was making the bitfield store and
> extract code follow similar logic, at least for the parts relating to
> -fs
On 06/24/2013 06:31 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Sandra Loosemore
wrote:
> On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>
>> This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
>> for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
>> 56997. A secondary goal of this pat
On 06/16/2013 01:08 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
56997. A secondary goal of this patch was making the bitfield store and
extract code follow similar logic
This part of the patch series fixes problems with bad code being emitted
for unaligned bitfield accesses, as reported in PRs 48784, 56341, and
56997. A secondary goal of this patch was making the bitfield store and
extract code follow similar logic, at least for the parts relating to
-fstrict-
