On 05/08/2015 02:22 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
* Sort out whether to update those top-level "missing" scripts.
Seems like we should if they came from automake.
I say we should *update* (from git). Not *downgrade to an older version*,
which is what the posted
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Jeff Law wrote:
> > * Sort out whether to update those top-level "missing" scripts.
> Seems like we should if they came from automake.
I say we should *update* (from git). Not *downgrade to an older version*,
which is what the posted patch did.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@co
On 05/07/2015 09:51 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Are there any cases where you had to do something other than just regenerate
the various files?
Nope - at least nothing that I would call "doing something other". What I did:
* touch each configure.ac to ensure automake is really used
* do
On 05/06/2015 04:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 05/05/2015 10:03 AM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Hello build machinery maintainers,
>>
>> following up
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/331902/focus=334462
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.patches/332160
>>
> [ ... snip ...
On 05/06/2015 03:01 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 5 May 2015 18:03:15, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>
>> Now that gcc-5 is out, what about an automake-1.11.6 update for gcc-6?
>>
>> BTW, the actual commands I use to re-run automake for everything (I found)
>> is:
>> $ export AUT
