2015-05-13 16:05 GMT+02:00 Marc Glisse :
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote:
>> What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as
>> decided for by the LWG 2439?
>
> non-NAN rho is already covered by rho >= 0.
Agreed on that.
- Daniel
On Wed, 13 May 2015, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite th
On 13/05/15 15:36 +0200, Daniel Krügler wrote:
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite
2015-05-13 15:32 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wakely :
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
>
> Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
>
> Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
What about assertions regarding non-NAN rho and finite theta, as
decided for by the LWG 2439?
-
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2015/n4383.html#2459
Voted into the WP in Lenexa.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, comitted to trunk.
commit 9bf3b9ea20334711ecdced656323f69959521a82
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Wed May 13 14:18:03 2015 +0100
* include/std/complex (polar): C
