On 02/05/15 19:07 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/05/15 18:27 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
These where simple to implement (almost too simple ... I probably
got something wrong!)
I didn't remember that std::
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
std::abs seems to work fine for unsigned, the overload in for
integral types just uses __builtin_fabs.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#2192
That overload should die.
--
Marc Glisse
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 02/05/15 18:27 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
These where simple to implement (almost too simple ... I probably
got something wrong!)
I didn't remember that std::abs works for unsigned. It will need more wor
On 02/05/15 18:27 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
These where simple to implement (almost too simple ... I probably
got something wrong!)
I didn't remember that std::abs works for unsigned. It will need more
work for performance, but that can certainly be
On Sat, 2 May 2015, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
These where simple to implement (almost too simple ... I probably
got something wrong!)
I didn't remember that std::abs works for unsigned. It will need more work
for performance, but that can certainly be done later (I didn't look at
the code beyon
These where simple to implement (almost too simple ... I probably
got something wrong!)
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
(Apart from using common_type_t, which is easy to change, these
functions meet the simpler rules for C++11 constexpr, so moving them
out of would probably allow
