On 18/01/16 21:24 +0100, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fixes PR60637 by using the appropriate built-in for the size of
the argument type. In Bugzilla Marc asked why we don't just use the
same code as for C++11, but I want to make this less intrusive change
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This fixes PR60637 by using the appropriate built-in for the size of
the argument type. In Bugzilla Marc asked why we don't just use the
same code as for C++11, but I want to make this less intrusive change
on the branches (trunk is already OK anyway).
This fixes PR60637 by using the appropriate built-in for the size of
the argument type. In Bugzilla Marc asked why we don't just use the
same code as for C++11, but I want to make this less intrusive change
on the branches (trunk is already OK anyway).
The new test is only run on x86 because it f
