On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:04:08AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> This patch is about the OpenMP 5.{1,2} implementation status.
>
> For omp/ompx/omx, I think it was a bit misleading. omp/ompx (and omx)
> are reserved namespaces; for 'omp' nothing needs to be done (either
> already implemented or no
This patch is about the OpenMP 5.{1,2} implementation status.
For omp/ompx/omx, I think it was a bit misleading. omp/ompx (and omx)
are reserved namespaces; for 'omp' nothing needs to be done (either
already implemented or not), while for 'ompx'/'omx' (vendor extension),
the note + footnote tries
