> Here's another attempt at documenting what's there now, this time
> avoiding using the ambiguous term "custom" at all in the text. I've
> also tried to address the other comments. Is this any better?
Yes, it's fine with me, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 08/03/2018 12:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/27/2018 03:44 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
submission,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
here is the patch
On 07/27/2018 03:44 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
>> TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
>> submission,
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
>>
>> here is the patch I've come up with based
> This is precisely what I found so confusing about the original text. To
> me, "custom" implies that the back end is *customized* to have its own
> descriptor implementation to conform to target-specific ABI standards,
> not that it uses a generic implementation in common code.
To me, "custom" s
On 07/27/2018 03:44 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
submission,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
here is the patch I've come up with based on reading the s
> Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
> TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
> submission,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
>
> here is the patch I've come up with based on reading the source. Is
> this technically acc
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 4:39 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>
> Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
> TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
> submission,
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
>
> here is the patch I've come
Apropos of the discussion about improving the docs for
TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS in the context of the C-SKY port
submission,
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-07/msg01454.html
here is the patch I've come up with based on reading the source. Is
this technically accurate? Any
