On Wed, 14 May 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> Am I missing something?
No, that seems sufficient (together with the observation that the target
handlers remain called after the others, so while there may be such bugs
involving them those bugs are irrelevant to this patch). The patch is OK
Am 12.05.2014 19:30, schrieb Joseph S. Myers:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> I didn't look close enough to the gfortran test results. PR driver/61126 is
>> a
>> fix for the regression introduced with the fix for the above issue. With
>> this
>> patch proposed by Manuel, gfor
On 12 May 2014 22:24, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>
>> I will be very surprised if the common defaults are overriding a FE
>> default and it is not a bug in the FE.
>
> Well, I think that needs justification, not just "very surprised".
> Identify (presu
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> I will be very surprised if the common defaults are overriding a FE
> default and it is not a bug in the FE.
Well, I think that needs justification, not just "very surprised".
Identify (presumably in an automated way) all the cases where an opti
On 12/05/2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> I didn't look close enough to the gfortran test results. PR driver/61126
>> is a
>> fix for the regression introduced with the fix for the above issue. With
>> this
>> patch proposed by Manuel, gfortran.dg/we
On Mon, 12 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I didn't look close enough to the gfortran test results. PR driver/61126 is a
> fix for the regression introduced with the fix for the above issue. With this
> patch proposed by Manuel, gfortran.dg/wextra_1.f now passes, and no new
> regressions seen
Am 08.05.2014 23:36, schrieb Joseph S. Myers:
> On Thu, 8 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering
>> of -Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted
>> with 4.7. No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and
> This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, ...
This caused pr61126.
Dominique
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
> This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering
> of -Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted
> with 4.7. No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and 4.8 branches. Ok to
> check in for these?
OK.
--
This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering of
-Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted with 4.7.
No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and 4.8 branches. Ok to check in for
these?
Matthias
2014-05-08 Manuel Lpez-Ibez
Matthi
10 matches
Mail list logo
