On 08/18/13 05:21, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation,
but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation
in GCC is only partial.
OK for trunk?
* doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkp
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation,
but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation in
GCC is only partial.
OK for trunk?
* doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkplus): Clarify that implementation is
This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation,
but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation in
GCC is only partial.
OK for trunk?
* doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkplus): Clarify that implementation is
incomplete.
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invo