Re: [patch] documentation: clarify that Cilk Plus implementation is incomplete

2013-08-19 Thread Aldy Hernandez
On 08/18/13 05:21, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Aldy Hernandez wrote: This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation, but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation in GCC is only partial. OK for trunk? * doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkp

Re: [patch] documentation: clarify that Cilk Plus implementation is incomplete

2013-08-18 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Aldy Hernandez wrote: This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation, but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation in GCC is only partial. OK for trunk? * doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkplus): Clarify that implementation is

[patch] documentation: clarify that Cilk Plus implementation is incomplete

2013-06-26 Thread Aldy Hernandez
This is a small cleanup to the Cilk Plus mention in our documentation, but more importantly, it clarifies that the Cilk Plus implementation in GCC is only partial. OK for trunk? * doc/invoke.texi (-fcilkplus): Clarify that implementation is incomplete. diff --git a/gcc/doc/invo