On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> *Ping*
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> This patch replaces all tests I could find, where the code is looking
>> for jump table data with GET_CODE(..)=ADDR_VEC and similar wi
*Ping*
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This patch replaces all tests I could find, where the code is looking
> for jump table data with GET_CODE(..)=ADDR_VEC and similar with
> JUMP_TABLE_DATA_P tests.
>
> Most replacements are mechanical, but a few are not:
>
Hello,
This patch replaces all tests I could find, where the code is looking
for jump table data with GET_CODE(..)=ADDR_VEC and similar with
JUMP_TABLE_DATA_P tests.
Most replacements are mechanical, but a few are not:
* The code in s390.c looked odd, I think the replacement code is
easier to fo
