> I'm a little worried that introducing PLUS_EXPR_CODE_P and friends
> invites too easy (not well thought) uses of it - they are distinct enough
> that we have very few "common" code-paths given the constraints on
> op2 of POINTER_PLUS_EXPR.
"grep -A1 -B1 POINTER_PLUS_EXPR *.c" convinced me of the
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of the transformations performed by associate_plusminus is:
>
> /* Second match patterns that allow contracting a plus-minus pair
> irrespective of overflow issues.
>
> [...]
> (T)(P + A) - (T)P -> (T)A
>
> but i
Hi,
one of the transformations performed by associate_plusminus is:
/* Second match patterns that allow contracting a plus-minus pair
irrespective of overflow issues.
[...]
(T)(P + A) - (T)P -> (T)A
but it is actually applied only to POINTER_PLUS_EXPR and pointer types:
