> Yes, OK if it (hopefully!) passes testing.
Yes, it passed bootstrap/regtest on x86-64/Linux so was applied.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:46 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > Related we're also missing to verify_location () on those in
> > verify_gimple_in_cfg. Having stale references to GCed BLOCKs
> > via locations can be difficult to track down...
> >
> > So can you add the verification bits as well?
>
> L
> Related we're also missing to verify_location () on those in
> verify_gimple_in_cfg. Having stale references to GCed BLOCKs
> via locations can be difficult to track down...
>
> So can you add the verification bits as well?
Like this?
* tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_in_cfg): Call verify_
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 06/26/2018 02:54 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this makes sure the goto_locus present (or not) on edges is properly
> > remapped
> > during inlining.
> >
> > Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
> >
> >
> > 2018-06-26 Eri
On 06/26/2018 02:54 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this makes sure the goto_locus present (or not) on edges is properly remapped
> during inlining.
>
> Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
>
>
> 2018-06-26 Eric Botcazou
>
> * tree-inline.c (remap_location): New function e
Hi,
this makes sure the goto_locus present (or not) on edges is properly remapped
during inlining.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
2018-06-26 Eric Botcazou
* tree-inline.c (remap_location): New function extracted from...
(copy_edges_for_bb): Add ID parameter.
