On 10/24/2013 09:40 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/24/2013 09:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
I originally shuffled std_gimplify_va_arg_expr () to gimplify.c, but i
believe the suggest
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 10/24/2013 09:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Andrew MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I originally shuffled std_gimplify_va_arg_expr () to gimplify.c, but i
>>> believe the suggestion was to eventually move i
On 10/24/2013 09:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I originally shuffled std_gimplify_va_arg_expr () to gimplify.c, but i
believe the suggestion was to eventually move it to targhooks.c.
build_va_arg_indirect_ref seems to hang around with it,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> I originally shuffled std_gimplify_va_arg_expr () to gimplify.c, but i
> believe the suggestion was to eventually move it to targhooks.c.
>
> build_va_arg_indirect_ref seems to hang around with it, and used by all the
> same things that use
I originally shuffled std_gimplify_va_arg_expr () to gimplify.c, but i
believe the suggestion was to eventually move it to targhooks.c.
build_va_arg_indirect_ref seems to hang around with it, and used by all
the same things that use std_gimplify_va_arg_expr, so this patch
currently lumps it