On 11/19/20 8:52 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there is a loophole in new string store merging support I added recently: it
> does not check that the stores are consecutive, which is obviously required
> if
> you want to concatenate them... Simple fix attached, the nice thing being
> t
Hi,
there is a loophole in new string store merging support I added recently: it
does not check that the stores are consecutive, which is obviously required if
you want to concatenate them... Simple fix attached, the nice thing being
that it can fall back to the regular processing if any hole