Re: [patch] PR56729

2013-04-17 Thread Jeff Law
On 04/17/2013 02:12 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: It looks like there are places in the middle end that use remove_insn on insns that are not actually emitted. This breaks the assert I added in df_insn_delete. The patch disables the assert for

Re: [patch] PR56729

2013-04-17 Thread Steven Bosscher
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> It looks like there are places in the middle end that use remove_insn >> on insns that are not actually emitted. This breaks the assert I added >> in df_insn_delete. The patch disables the assert for now. The comment >> before the assert

Re: [patch] PR56729

2013-04-02 Thread Richard Biener
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > It looks like there are places in the middle end that use remove_insn > on insns that are not actually emitted. This breaks the assert I added > in df_insn_delete. The patch disables the assert for now. The comment > before the a

[patch] PR56729

2013-03-29 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, It looks like there are places in the middle end that use remove_insn on insns that are not actually emitted. This breaks the assert I added in df_insn_delete. The patch disables the assert for now. The comment before the assert is now even messier than before but I think it's better to exp