On 12/08/14 16:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We're missing these overloads required by C++11.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
I think this should go on the branches too, any objections?
Committed to the 4.9 branch.
On 12/08/14 16:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
We're missing these overloads required by C++11.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
I missed an 'inline' on one of the new overloads, fixed by this patch,
which I'll commit once testing finishes.
commit 64240d493d1d72f78538d8bb06445d3ccb7a
We're missing these overloads required by C++11.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
I think this should go on the branches too, any objections?
commit c904682994e3c1d77abe16a4a7366e191b6ef6bc
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Tue Aug 12 15:24:35 2014 +0100
* include/bits/basic_string