Re: [patch] MULTILIB_DEFAULTS needs an update for ARM multilib builds

2012-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.05.2012 17:02, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 02/05/12 15:59, Matthias Klose wrote: >> On 02.05.2012 16:53, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >>> On 02/05/12 14:26, Matthias Klose wrote: I did see gcc-4.7 fail to build for an ARM soft-float/hard-float multilib configuration. The reason is that

Re: [patch] MULTILIB_DEFAULTS needs an update for ARM multilib builds

2012-05-02 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 02/05/12 15:59, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 02.05.2012 16:53, Richard Earnshaw wrote: >> On 02/05/12 14:26, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> I did see gcc-4.7 fail to build for an ARM soft-float/hard-float multilib >>> configuration. The reason is that gcc -print-multi-directory doesn't print >>> anythi

Re: [patch] MULTILIB_DEFAULTS needs an update for ARM multilib builds

2012-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
On 02.05.2012 16:53, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 02/05/12 14:26, Matthias Klose wrote: >> I did see gcc-4.7 fail to build for an ARM soft-float/hard-float multilib >> configuration. The reason is that gcc -print-multi-directory doesn't print >> anything for the non-default, and gcc -print-multi-li

Re: [patch] MULTILIB_DEFAULTS needs an update for ARM multilib builds

2012-05-02 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 02/05/12 14:26, Matthias Klose wrote: > I did see gcc-4.7 fail to build for an ARM soft-float/hard-float multilib > configuration. The reason is that gcc -print-multi-directory doesn't print > anything for the non-default, and gcc -print-multi-lib only prints `.' (and > then > not building the

[patch] MULTILIB_DEFAULTS needs an update for ARM multilib builds

2012-05-02 Thread Matthias Klose
I did see gcc-4.7 fail to build for an ARM soft-float/hard-float multilib configuration. The reason is that gcc -print-multi-directory doesn't print anything for the non-default, and gcc -print-multi-lib only prints `.' (and then not building the runtime libs for the non-default). The reason is th