> Okay, I've attached them. I hope it helps!
Thanks. The patch has been installed on the mainline.
--
Eric Botcazou
Patch is OK.
Arno
>>> Is a new submission necessary or can this be handled by committer?
>> Preferably yes.
>>> A new submission will take me a few days because I'm traveling ATM.
>
> There was a significant amount of bitrot. Apparently right after I
> submitted the patch, many macros were adj
> There was a significant amount of bitrot. Apparently right after I
> submitted the patch, many macros were adjusted by Adacore hitting the
> same files and copyrights as I did. I updated the patch set by hand and
> tested it against the 31 may snapshot. I also fixed the
> TOOLS_TARGET_PAIRS is
On 6/3/2015 11:03, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>> Is a new submission necessary or can this be handled by committer?
> Preferably yes.
>> A new submission will take me a few days because I'm traveling ATM.
There was a significant amount of bitrot. Apparently right after I
submitted the patch, many ma
* John Marino, 2015-06-03 :
> I have this fixed in an interesting way on gnat-aux. I found that
> setting TARGET_96_ROUND_53_LONG_DOUBLE affects other front ends, so you
> have to choose which one you want to be correct, GNAT or the C (or
> whatever, can't remember which ones were affected now)
On 6/3/2015 11:39, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> Patch looks good to me. The story with floats is that on FreeBSD, the
> i386 FPU is set to 53-bit floats, but the GNAT runtime library always
> issues a "finit" instruction to reset it to full precision, so we need
> to reset TARGET_96_ROUND_53_LONG_DOUBLE
* Eric Botcazou, 2015-06-03 :
> > Note 2) I removed reference to FreeBSD 6 and earlier. These platforms
> > have been EOL for years (FreeBSD 8 is EOL in 4 weeks)
> >
> > Note 3) FreeBSD should have switched to use errno years ago, this patch
> > does that now.
> >
> > Note 4) For all BSD except
> Okay, so that means the Makefile.in patch needs changing in two ways:
> 1. Don't remove TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS lines from two FreeBSD targets
> 2. Add TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS line to new DragonFly target.
Right.
> Is a new submission necessary or can this be handled by committer?
Preferably yes.
> A n
On 6/3/2015 09:30, Arnaud Charlet wrote:
>>> Note 1) All TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS in gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
>>> should be removed for most (if not all) platforms as they were moved to
>>> gnattools/configure and are now no-ops. However, for this patch set I
>>> only removed them for FreeBSD.
> > Note 1) All TOOL_TARGET_PAIRS in gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in
> > should be removed for most (if not all) platforms as they were moved to
> > gnattools/configure and are now no-ops. However, for this patch set I
> > only removed them for FreeBSD.
>
> They are actually used if you config
> This patch set is a subset of the GNAT patches I've maintained
> separately for a few years. I have limited it adding support for
> x86-64-*-dragonfly* and improving support for i[34567]86-*-freebsd and
> x86_64-*-freebsd*.
Thanks for posting it.
> I've added the attached patch to the gcc trun
This patch set is a subset of the GNAT patches I've maintained
separately for a few years. I have limited it adding support for
x86-64-*-dragonfly* and improving support for i[34567]86-*-freebsd and
x86_64-*-freebsd*.
In some cases of pre-processor macros, they may contain additions for
NetBSD an
12 matches
Mail list logo
