Re: [patch] Fix sched-deps DEP_POSTPONED, ds_t documentation

2013-05-24 Thread Vladimir Makarov
On 13-05-23 4:51 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: Ping**2 Steven, sorry for the delay. The patch is ok. Thanks for better documentation too. We need it as the scheduler is becoming more and more complicated.

Re: [patch] Fix sched-deps DEP_POSTPONED, ds_t documentation

2013-05-23 Thread Steven Bosscher
Ping**2 On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Ping > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: >> Hello, >> >> While working on a sched-deps based delay slot scheduler, I've come to >> the conclusion that the dependencies themselves must indicate whether >> the

Re: [patch] Fix sched-deps DEP_POSTPONED, ds_t documentation

2013-05-17 Thread Steven Bosscher
Ping On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > While working on a sched-deps based delay slot scheduler, I've come to > the conclusion that the dependencies themselves must indicate whether > the dependent ref is delayed. So I started hacking sched-deps and ran > into tr

[patch] Fix sched-deps DEP_POSTPONED, ds_t documentation

2013-05-12 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, While working on a sched-deps based delay slot scheduler, I've come to the conclusion that the dependencies themselves must indicate whether the dependent ref is delayed. So I started hacking sched-deps and ran into trouble... It turns out there is a problem introduced along with DEP_POSTPO