On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A smaller patch this time, but bigger impact: GIMPLE_H does not have
> to depend on TARGET_H. Only a few files need TARGET_H as well as
> GIMPLE_H, and most of them already included TARGET_H anyway. The ones
> that don't, are fix
Hello,
A smaller patch this time, but bigger impact: GIMPLE_H does not have
to depend on TARGET_H. Only a few files need TARGET_H as well as
GIMPLE_H, and most of them already included TARGET_H anyway. The ones
that don't, are fixed with this patch.
Bootstrapped&tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-