Re: [patch] Fix many Makefile dependencies, round 3

2012-06-01 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > A smaller patch this time, but bigger impact: GIMPLE_H does not have > to depend on TARGET_H. Only a few files need TARGET_H as well as > GIMPLE_H, and most of them already included TARGET_H anyway. The ones > that don't, are fix

[patch] Fix many Makefile dependencies, round 3

2012-05-31 Thread Steven Bosscher
Hello, A smaller patch this time, but bigger impact: GIMPLE_H does not have to depend on TARGET_H. Only a few files need TARGET_H as well as GIMPLE_H, and most of them already included TARGET_H anyway. The ones that don't, are fixed with this patch. Bootstrapped&tested on powerpc64-unknown-linux-

Re: [patch] Fix many Makefile dependencies, round 2

2012-05-31 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 7:53 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > Here is the next round of fixes.  I think I need one or two more > iterations before everything is fixed, but this already improves > things a bit again. > > While working on this, I noticed that cfglayout.h was being included >

Re: [patch] Fix many Makefile dependencies

2012-05-30 Thread Richard Guenther
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote: > Hello, > > Using the contrib/check_makefile_deps.sh script, I've uncovered a lot > of missing or redundant dependencies. The attached patch fixes > everything I've found for files up to et-forest.o. That means there > may be much more to co