> Do you have an idea why we test flag_trapping_math here?
Not really, the test was added with the contradictory comment:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-05/msg01674.html
--
Eric Botcazou
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the comment of the function reads:
>
> /* Given a tree comparison code, return the code that is the logical inverse
> of the given code. It is not safe to do this for floating-point
> comparisons, except for NE_EXPR and EQ_EXPR,
Hi,
the comment of the function reads:
/* Given a tree comparison code, return the code that is the logical inverse
of the given code. It is not safe to do this for floating-point
comparisons, except for NE_EXPR and EQ_EXPR, so we receive a machine mode
as well: if reversing the compari
