On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> But in theory this pessimizes code as aggregate_value_p returned true
>> for this? That is, isn't the bug that we rewrite a possible
>> return-slot-decl into SSA? (do we do that here?)
>
> Yes, aggregate_value_p returns true for this becaus
> But in theory this pessimizes code as aggregate_value_p returned true
> for this? That is, isn't the bug that we rewrite a possible
> return-slot-decl into SSA? (do we do that here?)
Yes, aggregate_value_p returns true for this because the ABI says that this
type is returned in memory. And,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is the ICE during the build of the Ada runtime on x86-64/Windows: the
> compiler stops on the assertion in declare_return_variable:
>
> var = return_slot;
> gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) != SSA_NAME);
>
> The pr
Hi,
this is the ICE during the build of the Ada runtime on x86-64/Windows: the
compiler stops on the assertion in declare_return_variable:
var = return_slot;
gcc_assert (TREE_CODE (var) != SSA_NAME);
The problem stems for the fnsplit pass: it turns
P.Sin (const long_long_flo
