> I think it is a bad idea to hard-code the real type.
> Does the following work for you? If so, I think that
> patch is obvious and you can go ahead and commit it.
>
> --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.c
> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ build_round_expr (tree arg, tree
Hi,
On 08.03.21 17:25, Eric Botcazou wrote:
AFAICS the code in build_round_expr implicitly assumes that __float128 exists,
which is *not* the common case among 64-bit architectures since "long double"
is generally already 128-bit for them.
Crossref: Introduced by the Patch for PR96711,
https:
Hi,
AFAICS the code in build_round_expr implicitly assumes that __float128 exists,
which is *not* the common case among 64-bit architectures since "long double"
is generally already 128-bit for them.
Tested on x86-64/Linux and SPARC64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
2021-03-08 Eric Botcazou
