On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:06 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Due to the different interfaces of int_size_in_bytes and
>> simple_type_size_in_bits (and 'size' in add_byte_size_attribute being
>> unsigned and not [unsigned] HWI) it would be cleaner to
>> add an early return after the call to int_size_in
> Due to the different interfaces of int_size_in_bytes and
> simple_type_size_in_bits (and 'size' in add_byte_size_attribute being
> unsigned and not [unsigned] HWI) it would be cleaner to
> add an early return after the call to int_size_in_bytes if its
> return value is -1 (and make sure the retur
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is an old bug report from Jan, which was closed, then reopened by Tom at
> some point, but the patch never got reviewed. The original submission is at:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg01857.html
>
> Tested on x
Hi,
this is an old bug report from Jan, which was closed, then reopened by Tom at
some point, but the patch never got reviewed. The original submission is at:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-05/msg01857.html
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2013-11-11 Jan Kratochvil
