On 09/11/2012 10:53 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> + force_expand_binop (index_mode, code_to_optab (MINUS),
Use sub_optab directly, rather than code_to_optab.
Otherwise ok.
r~
Hello,
Thanks for the quick review!
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 04:26 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> + rtx index = force_reg (index_mode, dispatch_index);
>
> You can't modify the result of force_reg. Use copy_to_{mode_,}reg instead.
Done.
>> +
On 09/10/2012 04:26 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> + rtx index = force_reg (index_mode, dispatch_index);
You can't modify the result of force_reg. Use copy_to_{mode_,}reg instead.
> + rtx tmp = expand_simple_binop (index_mode, MINUS,
> + index, CONST
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 04/18/2012 05:39 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> Well, if SJLJ lowering happens as gimple pass somewhere near the end of
>> gimple
>> queue, this should not be problem at all. (and implementation would be
>> cleaner)
>
> If you can find a c
