On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> I don't think so. get_address_description assumes TMR_BASE is in
>> canonical form,
>> that is, when it is an ADDR_EXPR we have a symbol and when not we have
>> a pointer.
>> TMR[&p->a] violates this and the gimple-fold.c part first canoni
> I don't think so. get_address_description assumes TMR_BASE is in
> canonical form,
> that is, when it is an ADDR_EXPR we have a symbol and when not we have
> a pointer.
> TMR[&p->a] violates this and the gimple-fold.c part first canonicalizes this
> to TMR[p + offsetof(a)].
get_address_descript
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 3:51 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the transformation done to TARGET_MEM_REF in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr
> is exactly the same as one of those done in maybe_fold_tmr, the latter is
> better written and the former function calls the latter, so this patch changes
Hi,
the transformation done to TARGET_MEM_REF in maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr
is exactly the same as one of those done in maybe_fold_tmr, the latter is
better written and the former function calls the latter, so this patch changes
maybe_canonicalize_mem_ref_addr to avoid touching TARGET_MEM_
