On 27/03/17 10:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 26/03/17 14:32 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 03/26/2017 02:13 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I suppose the patch is OK as it stands, but
On 26/03/17 14:32 -0600, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 03/26/2017 02:13 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I suppose the patch is OK as it stands, but I was going to suggest
restructuring it so that
On 03/26/2017 02:13 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I suppose the patch is OK as it stands, but I was going to suggest
restructuring it so that it talks about the default behavior first
and what
Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I suppose the patch is OK as it stands, but I was going to suggest
restructuring it so that it talks about the default behavior first and what
it does with non-default -std= options after t
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/19/2016 12:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/19/2016 07:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In PR69864 Manu suggests improving the docs to explain that
-Wnarrowing sometimes produces errors not warnings.
I think the right way to do that is clari
On 19/02/16 13:17 -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 02/19/2016 12:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/19/2016 07:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In PR69864 Manu suggests improving the docs to explain that
-Wnarrowing sometimes produces errors not warnings.
I think the right way to do that is clari
On 02/19/2016 12:01 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/19/2016 07:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In PR69864 Manu suggests improving the docs to explain that
-Wnarrowing sometimes produces errors not warnings.
I think the right way to do that is clarify how it interacts with
-std. Specifically that t
On 02/19/2016 07:42 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
In PR69864 Manu suggests improving the docs to explain that
-Wnarrowing sometimes produces errors not warnings.
I think the right way to do that is clarify how it interacts with
-std. Specifically that the effect of -Wnarrowing listed first in the
m
In PR69864 Manu suggests improving the docs to explain that
-Wnarrowing sometimes produces errors not warnings.
I think the right way to do that is clarify how it interacts with
-std. Specifically that the effect of -Wnarrowing listed first in the
manual *only* applies to C++98 modes, For all lat
