> For avoidance of doubt, the patch is fine then.
Thanks, installed with the tm.texi bits.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 09/15/2015 09:50 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
It's not Ada-specific in the sense that, if you want to raise an exception on
a stack overflow in any language with the middle-end SJLJ scheme, the current
setting is definitely not sufficient and you'll get a crash during unwinding.
For avoidance o
> So it looks like some targets are at least optionally still using sjlj
> exceptions and would be affected by this change. AFAICT it only makes a
> difference with -fstack-check and would be a bugfix even for those
> targets - correct?
Yes, for example the 32-bit Windows compiler still uses SJLJ
On 09/14/2015 10:23 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
as documented, STACK_CHECK_PROTECT is supposed to be an "estimate of the
amount of stack required to propagate an exception". It's (mainly) for Ada
and it needs to distinguish the various EH schemes, which might have different
needs. While the curre
Hi,
as documented, STACK_CHECK_PROTECT is supposed to be an "estimate of the
amount of stack required to propagate an exception". It's (mainly) for Ada
and it needs to distinguish the various EH schemes, which might have different
needs. While the current setting is OK for the front-end SJLJ
