On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:51:53PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> Hello Uros, and everyone else,
>>
>> Now that LRA is always used for the i386 targets, reload_in_progress
>> is never set so all code conditional on it is now dead. The attac
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:51 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello Uros, and everyone else,
>
> Now that LRA is always used for the i386 targets, reload_in_progress
> is never set so all code conditional on it is now dead. The attached
> patch removes this code.
Bootstrapped&tested on x86_64-unknown-
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:51:53PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello Uros, and everyone else,
>
> Now that LRA is always used for the i386 targets, reload_in_progress
> is never set so all code conditional on it is now dead. The attached
> patch removes this code.
>
> Sadly I'm having difficu
Hello Uros, and everyone else,
Now that LRA is always used for the i386 targets, reload_in_progress
is never set so all code conditional on it is now dead. The attached
patch removes this code.
Sadly I'm having difficulty testing the patch because I have no access
to a suitable x86_64 or ix86 box
