On Sun, Sep 8, 2024 at 12:22 PM Georg-Johann Lay wrote:
>
> The reason for PR116326 is that LRA and reload require different
> ELIMINABLE_REGS for a multi-register frame pointer. As ELIMINABLE_REGS
> is used to initialize static const objects, it is not possible to make
> ELIMINABLE_REGS dependen
The reason for PR116326 is that LRA and reload require different
ELIMINABLE_REGS for a multi-register frame pointer. As ELIMINABLE_REGS
is used to initialize static const objects, it is not possible to make
ELIMINABLE_REGS dependent on -mlra.
It was also concluded that it is not desirable to adj
