Hi Julian!
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:10:50 +, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:25:42 +0100
> Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > [...]
>
> I've made those changes in the attached, thank you. OK?
Yes, thanks!
Grüße
Thomas
> 2018-XX-YY James Norris
> Cesar Philippidis
>
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:25:42 +0100
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> In addition to your "(1" token sequence (and similar ones), I suppose
> what these code paths in C and C++ are supposed to catch the "wait ()"
> case (see line 149 of gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/goacc/asyncwait-1.c).
>
> I suppose in C,
Hi Julian!
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:17:42 +0100, Julian Brown
wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:08:37 -0700
> Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
> > On 09/26/2018 12:50 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> > >
> > >> Attached is an old patch which updated the C
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018, Julian Brown wrote:
> > But for C, it does not appear that c_parser_expr_list has a code path
> > that can return a zero-length list at all. So, we can elide the
> > diagnostic with no change to compiler behaviour. This patch does that,
> > and also changes the C++ diagnostic,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:17:42 +0100
Julian Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:08:37 -0700
> Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
> > On 09/26/2018 12:50 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> > >
> > >> Attached is an old patch which updated the C and C++ F
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 14:08:37 -0700
Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> On 09/26/2018 12:50 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> >
> >> Attached is an old patch which updated the C and C++ FEs to use
> >> %<)%> for the right ')' symbol. It's mostly a cosmetic chang
On 09/26/2018 12:50 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
>
>> Attached is an old patch which updated the C and C++ FEs to use %<)%>
>> for the right ')' symbol. It's mostly a cosmetic change. All of the
>> changes are self-contained to the OpenACC code path.
>
>
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> Attached is an old patch which updated the C and C++ FEs to use %<)%>
> for the right ')' symbol. It's mostly a cosmetic change. All of the
> changes are self-contained to the OpenACC code path.
Why is the "before ')'" included in the call to c_pars
Attached is an old patch which updated the C and C++ FEs to use %<)%>
for the right ')' symbol. It's mostly a cosmetic change. All of the
changes are self-contained to the OpenACC code path.
Is this OK for trunk? I bootstrapped and regtested it for x86_64 Linux
with nvptx offloading.
Thanks,
Cesa
