Hi!
On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:58:54 +0100, I wrote:
> Hi Casar!
>
> Can you please help me trying to understand the following change, that
> you've done a long time ago:
>
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
> > On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >
> > >
Hi Casar!
Can you please help me trying to understand the following change, that
you've done a long time ago:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> >
Hi!
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 16:03:05 +0100, I wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
> > On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > > wrote:
> > >> This patch is the first step to enabling paral
Hi!
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> >> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
> I've committed this updated v
Hi!
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:36:03 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/28/2014 10:02 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> >> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
> >
> > I think I have found one
Hi!
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014 07:28:24 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> > wrote:
> >> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsu
On 07/28/2014 10:02 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi Cesar!
>
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
>
> I think I have found one issue in this code -- but please verify that my
> understanding o
Hi Cesar!
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
I think I have found one issue in this code -- but please verify that my
understanding of reductions is correct. Namely:
> --- a/gcc/omp-low.c
> +++
On 07/08/2014 07:28 AM, Cesar Philippidis wrote:
> Thanks for catching those problems! I've committed this updated version
> of the patch.
I forgot to remove the support for the collapse clause in from the loop
construct in the c frontend. I did so upstream, but not internally. I've
checked in th
On 07/07/2014 02:55 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
> wrote:
>> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
>
> Thanks!
>
>> As mentioned earlier, this patch isn't complete yet. For starters, parts
>> of it depends
Hi Cesar!
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 16:10:56 -0700, Cesar Philippidis
wrote:
> This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
Thanks!
> As mentioned earlier, this patch isn't complete yet. For starters, parts
> of it depends on our internal ptx backend. I've temporarily rema
This patch is the first step to enabling parallel reductions in openacc.
The approach I'm using here is a bit different the to the existing
method in openmp. For clarity, consider the following example:
for (i = 0, i < n; i++)
sum += 1;
Currently, gcc breaks up the for loop into m partitions, o
12 matches
Mail list logo
