Sorry for the extra-long delay on this one.
"Steve Ellcey " writes:
> The gcc.target/octeon-bbit-2.c is failing with -Os because that optimization
> level does not do whichever optimization it is that results in a bbit instead
> of a bbit[01]l. I would like to skip this test for -Os the way it a
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 11:09 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > The gcc.target/octeon-bbit-2.c is failing with -Os because that optimization
> > level does not do whichever optimization it is that results in a bbit
> > instead
> > of a bbit[01]l. I woul
On Oct 8, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> The gcc.target/octeon-bbit-2.c is failing with -Os because that optimization
> level does not do whichever optimization it is that results in a bbit instead
> of a bbit[01]l. I would like to skip this test for -Os the way it already
> gets
> skip
The gcc.target/octeon-bbit-2.c is failing with -Os because that optimization
level does not do whichever optimization it is that results in a bbit instead
of a bbit[01]l. I would like to skip this test for -Os the way it already gets
skipped for -O0.
Tested on mips-mti-elf. Ok for checkin?
Stev
