>> The change may be small enough that an assignment isn't needed.
>> We (ie, the gfortran developers) will need to check.
>
> I think that’s small enough, compared to what we’ve accepted as such in the
> past.
> If not, a disclaimer by Russell putting his change in the public domain would
> also
> The change may be small enough that an assignment isn't needed.
> We (ie, the gfortran developers) will need to check.
I think that’s small enough, compared to what we’ve accepted as such in the
past.
If not, a disclaimer by Russell putting his change in the public domain would
also be a quic
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 09:39:03PM -0700, Russell Whitesides wrote:
>
> On 05/14/2015 09:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:53:11PM -0700, Russell Whitesides wrote:
> >> Patch below prevents printing of duplicate statements in module files.
> >> Without it module files grow e
On 05/14/2015 09:36 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:53:11PM -0700, Russell Whitesides wrote:
Patch below prevents printing of duplicate statements in module files.
Without it module files grow exponentially in size with nested use of
modules that contain equivalence statements
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 08:53:11PM -0700, Russell Whitesides wrote:
> Patch below prevents printing of duplicate statements in module files.
> Without it module files grow exponentially in size with nested use of
> modules that contain equivalence statements. Tested on x86-64-linux.
>
> https://
Patch below prevents printing of duplicate statements in module files.
Without it module files grow exponentially in size with nested use of
modules that contain equivalence statements. Tested on x86-64-linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60780
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show
