Hi Janus,
>> OK for trunk?
> Looks good to m
Committed as rev. 201658; also committed a
snippet to the documentation.
Thanks for the review!
Thomas
2013/8/11 Thomas Koenig :
> Hi Janus,
>
>> So: Ok for trunk from my side.
>>
>> However, I would prefer to disable the warning by default, but include
>> it in -Wall.
>
> Here's a patch to do just that.
>
> Regression-tested (hence the changes to the existing test cases :-)
>
> OK for trunk?
Looks
Hi Janus,
> So: Ok for trunk from my side.
>
> However, I would prefer to disable the warning by default, but include
> it in -Wall.
Here's a patch to do just that.
Regression-tested (hence the changes to the existing test cases :-)
OK for trunk? Once it goes in, I will also update the WWW ch
Hi Thomas,
> the rather self-explanatory patch implements the -Wzerotrip
> option. The positive form is not really useful, because
> the option is on by default (so the default behavior is
> not changed).
>
> The negative form of the option, -Wno-zerotrip, suppresses the
> warning. I have also a
Hello world,
the rather self-explanatory patch implements the -Wzerotrip
option. The positive form is not really useful, because
the option is on by default (so the default behavior is
not changed).
The negative form of the option, -Wno-zerotrip, suppresses the
warning. I have also added infor